This is a discussion on "Problem validating "Strict" with forms" within the Web Page Design section. This forum, and the thread "Problem validating "Strict" with forms are both part of the Design Your Website category.
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
||
Problem validating "Strict" with forms
|
||
| Notices |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Problem validating "Strict" with forms
Hi All
Today I had the afternoon spare so I thought "I know, i'll update all the pages on my website so they pass W3 validation under the "Strict" Doctype. The site was previously coded "Transitional" and it all validated 100%. Most pages I was able to update to Strict with just a few minor alterations but I have a problem with validating 2 types of page. The problem pages both contain forms that aren't validating. The first form is code that I had to paste in to my HTML for my 3rd party shopping cart to work. The second form is code that I had to paste in for my 3rd party contact form to work. So basically, I am reluctant to play around with the forms because: a) I don't want my shopping cart or contact form to stop working and b) When the error messages come back from the validator I don't really understand where to start in correcting them! My question to you good people is do I update half the site as Strict and leave these problem pages as "Transitional" or can anyone tell me how I can validate these problem pages to Strict so that my contact form and shopping basket remain working? Here are the links to the contact form page and one of the shopping cart pages: http://www.sjohnsonart.co.uk/HTML/contact.html http://www.sjohnsonart.co.uk/HTML/WC150STD1LGOPT.html Kind Regards Craig |
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Problem validating "Strict" with forms
That's the trouble with 3rd party code: it's often badly written.
I would just leave these pages as HTML Transitional, unless you're comfortable mucking around under the hood of your third party code snippets. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Problem validating "Strict" with forms
Having a look at your code and the areas where the pages fail validation it would require rewriting some of the functionality of these 3rd party snippets. Probably not a good idea if you don't know what is what.
As Mike says above, probably safer to stick with transitional for these pages.
Last Blog Entry: The wannabe juggler's quest (Oct 27th, 2007)
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Strict XHTML validation error : "tabindex" | newoptical | Web Page Design | 1 | Aug 24th, 2007 16:21 |
| ? IS "meta name="robots" content="?" necessary in pages ? | Love2Java | Starting Out | 6 | Aug 8th, 2007 13:48 |
| "Click to Activate" and Validating Flash | Sgaspar11 | Flash & Multimedia Forum | 0 | Jun 7th, 2007 19:03 |
| window.opener.document["nameForm"].getElementById("someid").value; doesnt work | drpompeii | JavaScript Forum | 0 | Feb 17th, 2007 23:09 |
| <option value="yes" class="x"> problem in Firefox | mameha1977 | Web Page Design | 1 | Jun 21st, 2006 11:20 |