Closing tags in the validator

geyids · #1 (**permalink**) Jan 13th, 2008, 21:46

I have validated my page gives some errors but I dont know how it came up with them. Looks like all the closing tags > are all wrong. What could be the problem?? Checkout...

Jack Franklin · #2 (**permalink**) Jan 13th, 2008, 21:48

You are not closing img tags correctly. You are using:

Code: Select all

<img src="image">

But for a xHTML doctype, it should be:

Code: Select all

<img src="image" />

HTH

alexgeek · #3 (**permalink**) Jan 13th, 2008, 21:50

Moved to accessibility section.

You are using an XHTML doctype this means you need to self-close elements.
e.g. this:

HTML: Select all

<link href="style.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">

becomes:

HTML: Select all

<link href="style.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />

geyids · #4 (**permalink**) Jan 13th, 2008, 22:19

is this wrong? Its from the google analytics code

Code: Select all

…s.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'>\<\/script>" );

alexgeek · #5 (**permalink**) Jan 13th, 2008, 22:37

I don't think there should be / inside those script tags.

Monie · #6 (**permalink**) Jan 14th, 2008, 02:39

xHTML doctype:

HTML: Select all

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">

alexgeek · #7 (**permalink**) Jan 14th, 2008, 05:52

Use a strict doctype:

HTML: Select all

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">

Monie · #8 (**permalink**) Jan 14th, 2008, 06:37

I never know the differences....
Thanks Sir, you made me read Doctype article from W3School!

Quote:

HTML

HTML 4.01 specifies three document types: Strict, Transitional, and Frameset.

HTML Strict DTD

Use this when you want clean markup, free of presentational clutter. Use this together with Cascading Style Sheets (CSS):

HTML: Select all

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">

HTML Transitional DTD

The Transitional DTD includes presentation attributes and elements that W3C expects to move to a style sheet. Use this when you need to use HTML's presentational features because your readers don't have browsers that support Cascading Style Sheets (CSS):

HTML: Select all

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">

Quote:

XHTML

XHTML 1.0 specifies three XML document types: Strict, Transitional, and Frameset.

XHTML Strict DTD

Use this DTD when you want clean markup, free of presentational clutter. Use this together with Cascading Style Sheets (CSS):

HTML: Select all

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"  "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">

XHTML Transitional DTD

Use this DTD when you need to use XHTML's presentational features because your readers don't have browsers that support Cascading Style Sheets (CSS):

HTML: Select all

    <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">

I've been using the wrong one! Damn! What a shame!

alexgeek · #9 (**permalink**) Jan 14th, 2008, 06:38

You're calling me sir too now? Ha.
We usually don't mind whether it's a HTML or XHTML Doctype, just as long as it's strict.

Monie · #10 (**permalink**) Jan 14th, 2008, 06:45

Yes Sir!

Here is another nice article I found!

Quote:

Why do you like HTML 4.01 strict? Isn't it SO last season?

That may be so, but it's still a valid W3C 'standard,' and it is the latest standard with any widespread support. I think most people overestimate the benefits of XHTML, at the same time as they underestimate the benefits of using a Strict DTD. In my opinion, using a Strict DTD, either HTML 4.01 Strict or XHTML 1.0 Strict, is far more important for the quality of the future web than whether or not there is an X in front of the name. The Strict DTD promotes a separation of structure and presentation, which makes a site so much easier to maintain. You can re-style a site completely by updating a single CSS file, rather than making identical changes to 10,000 pages with presentational markup.

It also has lots of benefits for the user (quicker download) and the server (less bandwidth), as well as for search engines (better content-to-markup ratio). Last but not least, it makes it a lot easier to create an accessible site.

The main cause of confusion seems to be that many web authors think that HTML must be written as 'tag soup.' The truth is that you can - and should! - write HTML 4.01 that is almost identical to XHTML 1.0. Just because HTML allows some shortcuts doesn't mean that you should use them. There are even beginners who have been conned into believing that CSS can only be used with XHTML, not with HTML!

alexgeek · #11 (**permalink**) Jan 14th, 2008, 06:50

Try to post the source so we don't seem like copy cats

edit,
This is? http://webstandardsgroup.org/features/tommy-olsson.cfm

Monie · #12 (**permalink**) Jan 14th, 2008, 07:00

Yeah, you are right about that link Sir! I got it from there!

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Title Tags, Meta Tags and SEO - Keyword Density or Keyword Spamming?	pctank	Search Engine Optimization (SEO)	2	Jul 4th, 2008 11:52
Validator	jtyoungs	Web Page Design	8	Nov 8th, 2007 15:56
CSS Validator issues	Hardbyte	Web Page Design	11	Sep 6th, 2007 12:48
Web2.0 Validator	spinal007	Webforumz Cafe	8	May 29th, 2007 17:38
W3C Validator	Maverick25r	Web Page Design	14	Oct 23rd, 2006 00:45

		Webforumz.com > Main Forums > Design Your Website > Web Page Design
Closing tags in the validator