logo crit

[karloff]

working on some ideas for a new logo. really just stuck up a solid font for my current port but i'm trying a few new ideas. let me know your thoughts.
top attachment is the old logo

trying to go with a strong font, but sorta funky

[karloff]

here are the current logos

[Marc]

Number one... It looks like NO2 reads as "Pal Crley" and NO£ looks like "PAU Curley".

[alexgeek]

If you made the "L" more distinguishable in Paul for the 3rd it would be perfect.
The first is too dull and second is ridiculously unreadable.

[Lchad]

#1 is my favorite because it's the easiest to read. I like the upper and lower case as well.

#2 is not really legible and #3 doesn't look like Paul.

I like the two colors however I always wonder how that will work in print.
Especially newspaper.

[delusion]

Also take a good look into the spacing between letters. In the first one (my favourite) the A and the U are barely touching, but furtheron the E and the Y are pretty much merged..

[karloff]

thanks for the comments

the logo was rushed a bit and the kerning wasn't polished at all. I did like the 2nd purely for the fact that it make the type look like shapes rather than straight typography. anyway, its not got a good review so i will take your comments onboard.

working on the kerning for the others, however i feel the 1st can be a bit boring. may work on the angles of some lettering.

i can't seem to get the 3rd sitting nicely. the l always seems to look out of place.

anyway i'll work on some things and get back to you

[Monie]

First one looks cool.

[Stuart]

I like the colors in general, but number 1 seems to be the one easiest to read... I actually like the current logos (from your second post) better. Maybe you can try playing around with them as well.