Would really appreciate testers!

This is a discussion on "Would really appreciate testers!" within the Free Web Site Critique section. This forum, and the thread "Would really appreciate testers! are both part of the Design Your Website category.


 Subscribe in a reader

Go Back   Webforumz.com > Main Forums > Design Your Website > Free Web Site Critique

Notices




Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old Mar 29th, 2008, 16:36
Reputable Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 116
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Exclamation Would really appreciate testers!

Info
Would really appreciate testers!
Thumbnails by Thumbshots.de
Technology: Static HTML
Upgrade to a SuperMember Account!
Hi,

Just converted this site from tables and Transitional html to Strict and CSS, it's not 100% complete but I'd like some feedback on how it works on your system. I don't have access to IE (ptur!) but I suppose it must be tested in that non-the-less. I have also converted from javascript to CSS roll-overs on the category selection buttons, quite chuffed that I got that to work Knowing IE, it will be broken in that browser though.



I am going to add click-through linking to larger format images, this has not been implemented yet but will be adding that next (might even be done by the time you read this, but right now I need a break).

Here it is:
http://www.jonathanmortimer.co.uk/test2

I have tested in Firefox and Safari. I have not validated it yet. Any comments on style are also welcome

Thanks!

Last edited by jonnymorris; Mar 29th, 2008 at 16:39.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old Mar 29th, 2008, 16:38
Jack Franklin's Avatar
Moderator

SuperMember
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Cornwall, England
Posts: 1,408
Blog Entries: 8
Thanks: 18
Thanked 14 Times in 14 Posts
Re: Would really appreciate testers!

Hi Jonny,

The Critique is broken at the moment because of the upgrade, so you need to post your address
__________________
Jack Franklin - Webforumz Moderator
(x)HTML | CSS | PHP | MySQL | JQuery (Javascript)
Contact: My Blog | Twitter | Delicious
Want Lessons? PM me.
If you think I've helped, please press the 'Thanks' Button.
Last Blog Entry: A Week with VBulletin (Aug 28th, 2008)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Mar 29th, 2008, 16:42
Reputable Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 116
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: Would really appreciate testers!

Ignore the colours on the contact page form, that was just me experimenting.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Mar 30th, 2008, 05:07
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: California
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Would really appreciate testers!

It is broken in IE6. (What isn't?)

The transparent PNGs have a light blue outline instead of transparency, and there's a lot of flicker when the images switch.

And I receive an "unknown runtime error" from JavaScript when clicking on portfolio pages in the bottom nav bar.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Mar 30th, 2008, 09:34
Reputable Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 116
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: Would really appreciate testers!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trekx View Post
It is broken in IE6. (What isn't?)

The transparent PNGs have a light blue outline instead of transparency, and there's a lot of flicker when the images switch.

And I receive an "unknown runtime error" from JavaScript when clicking on portfolio pages in the bottom nav bar.
Thanks for the feedback. Typical bloody IE! I would be interested to know if my nature site works for you - http://www.jonathanmortimer.co.uk/nature
It uses the same javascript technology.

If anyone has any suggestions why this does not work in IE, please do tell! Perhaps I should ask this in the Javascript forum.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Mar 30th, 2008, 09:37
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: California
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Would really appreciate testers!

I'm using the Virtual PC version of IE 6 (the version Microsoft distributes for testing web pages), so it might actually work in a real version of IE 6.

But for me, the nature site has the same "unknown runtime error" problem.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old Mar 30th, 2008, 12:56
Reputable Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 459
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Would really appreciate testers!

To sort out your transparency issue in ie6 use the pngfix.

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/bobosola/pngtestfixed.htm

Can't help with the javascript error though.

Pat
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old Mar 30th, 2008, 13:44
Reputable Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 116
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: Would really appreciate testers!

Quote:
Originally Posted by dab42pat View Post
To sort out your transparency issue in ie6 use the pngfix.

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/bobosola/pngtestfixed.htm
Thanks, though when I tried to incorporate this to my pages it didn't do anything, it could be because I have not set width and height for my PNG images but I don't know how to do that when using the CSS background (url) method.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old Mar 30th, 2008, 13:51
Reputable Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 116
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: Would really appreciate testers!

OK, I cheated and placed a white background on my PNG's. One IE failing down, several dozen to go..

One thing I don't understand is why my CSS is broken in IE wrt underlined links.. anybody?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old Mar 30th, 2008, 20:49
frinkky's Avatar
Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Southampton
Age: 30
Posts: 351
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 2
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Re: Would really appreciate testers!

Don't cheat

Code: Select all
#test {
background: url(images/blahblah.png) no-repeat;
width:whateverpx;
height:whateverpx;
}

#test {
background: transparent;
filter: progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader (src='images/blahblah.png', sizingMethod='scale');
}
And what specifically are you having issues with underlined links? It helps if you explain your problem in detail rather than some broad question.
Last Blog Entry: Fobriwap! (Mar 10th, 2008)

Last edited by frinkky; Mar 30th, 2008 at 21:38.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old Mar 30th, 2008, 21:20
Reputable Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chester, UK
Age: 18
Posts: 443
Thanks: 2
Thanked 29 Times in 29 Posts
Re: Would really appreciate testers!

your contact page failed validation

And html tidy only found 10 warnings, if you don't have the html tidy plugin for firefox i highly reccomend you getting it

HTML TIDY REPORTS:

Quote:
line 84 column 12 - Warning: <img> attribute "width" has invalid value "97px"
line 84 column 12 - Warning: <img> attribute "height" has invalid value "76px"
line 89 column 12 - Warning: <img> attribute "width" has invalid value "97px"
line 89 column 12 - Warning: <img> attribute "height" has invalid value "76px"
line 94 column 10 - Warning: <img> attribute "width" has invalid value "97px"
line 94 column 10 - Warning: <img> attribute "height" has invalid value "76px"
line 98 column 10 - Warning: <img> attribute "width" has invalid value "97px"
line 98 column 10 - Warning: <img> attribute "height" has invalid value "76px"
line 104 column 10 - Warning: <img> attribute "width" has invalid value "97px"
line 104 column 10 - Warning: <img> attribute "height" has invalid value "76px"
<img> attribute "width" has invalid value "740px" HTML width and height attributes do not need "px"; their units are always assumed to be pixels.


Incorrect: <img src="example.png" alt="Example" width="740px" height="40px" />

Correct
: <img src="example.png" alt="Example" width="740" height="40" />



Other than that runs perfectly fine in firefox, launchin IE will crash my pc so i'll leave that to other people to do

Just my input... hope it's in someway helpful
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old Mar 30th, 2008, 21:22
Reputable Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chester, UK
Age: 18
Posts: 443
Thanks: 2
Thanked 29 Times in 29 Posts
Re: Would really appreciate testers!

thats in regards to the pages with the gallerys, it's nothing important, passes validation either way W3C don't regard it as important.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old Mar 30th, 2008, 21:26
Reputable Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 116
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: Would really appreciate testers!

Quote:
Originally Posted by frinkky View Post
Don't cheat

And what specifically are you having issues with underlinks? It helps if you explain your problem in detail rather than some broad question.
Thanks for the advice! I will try and use that code once I've sorted out the javascript problem (featuring exclusively in an IE near you! )

I seem to have fixed the css underline links problem now, just a CSS thing that IE didn't handle properly.

I also sorted my pages so that they all validate (well, all except the one with a form on it, I will look at that another day) and so does the CSS.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old Mar 30th, 2008, 21:30
Reputable Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 116
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: Would really appreciate testers!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bocaj View Post
your contact page failed validation

Incorrect: <img src="example.png" alt="Example" width="740px" height="40px" />

Correct
: <img src="example.png" alt="Example" width="740" height="40" />
I never knew about the px thing, thanks

Quote:
Other than that runs perfectly fine in firefox, launchin IE will crash my pc so i'll leave that to other people to do
I remembered I can run WinXP and IE 6 in Qemu on my Mac, it's slow but it does the job (eventually).
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old Mar 31st, 2008, 08:36
Reputable Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 116
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: Would really appreciate testers!

Quote:
Originally Posted by frinkky View Post
Don't cheat

Code: Select all
#test {
background: url(images/blahblah.png) no-repeat;
width:whateverpx;
height:whateverpx;
}

#test {
background: transparent;
filter: progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader (src='images/blahblah.png', sizingMethod='scale');
}
OK, I don't understand changing the background to transparent, that just gets rid of my image completely in Firefox and Safari.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old Mar 31st, 2008, 11:49
Reputable Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chester, UK
Age: 18
Posts: 443
Thanks: 2
Thanked 29 Times in 29 Posts
Re: Would really appreciate testers!

in which case just you could just wrap it in a conditional comment.

there are dozens of articles on the png hack, some offering different methods

A conditional comment

Quote:
<!--[if IE 6]>
Special instructions for IE 6 here
<![endif]-->

Although they validate, and work, they're still not the best way to go.

There are dozens of articles on why not to use them, and others on how to implement them so people are split on wether to use them or not.

They're really just a quick fix, there are alternatives to fixing problems that often take longer, but conditional comments

Code: Select all
#test {
background: url(images/blahblah.png) no-repeat;
width:whateverpx;
height:whateverpx;
}

<!--[if IE 6]>
#test {
background: transparent;
filter: progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader (src='images/blahblah.png', sizingMethod='scale');
}
<![endif]-->
If you google it, you'll end up trawling through hundreds of articles on different fixes. Most involve conditional comments, some javascript and some take other approaches.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old Mar 31st, 2008, 12:25
frinkky's Avatar
Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Southampton
Age: 30
Posts: 351
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 2
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Re: Would really appreciate testers!

Quote:
Originally Posted by jonnymorris View Post
OK, I don't understand changing the background to transparent, that just gets rid of my image completely in Firefox and Safari.
Very strange. Thats copied directly from a website I've done recently and I have no issues in either FF or Safari
Last Blog Entry: Fobriwap! (Mar 10th, 2008)