This is a discussion on "Who Is Right or Wrong ?" within the Webforumz Cafe section. This forum, and the thread "Who Is Right or Wrong ? are both part of the Community category.
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
||
Who Is Right or Wrong ?
|
||
| Notices |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who Is Right or Wrong ?
"telling a webdesigner to use Internet Explorer is like like swearing in church"..
|
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Who Is Right or Wrong ?
Quote:
Last Blog Entry: Strict and Transitional Doctype's (Sep 12th, 2008)
Last edited by saltedm8; Feb 12th, 2008 at 20:29. |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who Is Right or Wrong ?
i thinks i.e is more meticulous with codes than others. You can see whatever you do with codes with i.e. if you are succesfull. But with others your chance maybe not.
Last edited by savarona; Feb 12th, 2008 at 21:52. |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who Is Right or Wrong ?
The unfortunate thing is that we do have to compensate for those who dont have firefox, opera, or safarii so we as coders have to devise new ways to hack ie and make what we want to work work.... thats the way its always gonna be...
|
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Who Is Right or Wrong ?
You have to understand that there's history that distorts comments on browsers, primarily residual resentment at Microsoft's heavy-handed attempts to monopolize web-browsing. Its non-compliance with W3c standards was largely intentional: It intended to subvert the standards by abusing its market power, to the end that Internet Explorer would be the ONLY mainstream web browser.
The courts and the web development community broke MS's back, largely through Gecko/Mozilla/Firefox. Since then, MS has had to concentrate on developing a good standards-compliant browser or else suffer its own extinction. But the affair left behind a lot of well-deserved distrust and resentment of IE. As between Firefox and IE7, I think their strengths and weaknesses reflect how they were created. Firefox, being the creature of geeks doing what they want, tends to concentrate on cutting-edge technology and the newest standards/features. IE7, being a consumer product, tends to focus on better implementation of mainstream technologies. So IE7 is now, at least arguably, less buggy for HTML 4.01, CSS 1, and even the more fundamental rendering of XHTML 1.0. Firefox is way ahead in CSS 2.1, CSS 3 and DOM -- FF is working on compliance with DOM3 while IE7 is still struggling to perfect DOM1 standards compliance. (IE7 actually does do an "okay" job with XSLT although XLST is technically part of the DOM3 standards.) |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who Is Right or Wrong ?
Quote:
IE7 does not support XHTML at all. I'm also curious about how IE7 is "arguably less buggy for HTML 4.01 and CSS 1". You say it's arguable, so I'd like to hear the argument. |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who Is Right or Wrong ?
I agree that FF is somehow the closest when it comes to web standard. I'm using joomla and it runs smoothly in FF. But in IE, eerrrr....
|
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who Is Right or Wrong ?
hmmm, i wonder if IE8 is going to change anyones opinions lol
|
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who Is Right or Wrong ?
Let us hope for the best...
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What am I doing wrong?? | PunkManager | Starting Out | 3 | Sep 4th, 2007 12:54 |
| Something wrong | Daniel | Webforumz Cafe | 11 | Jul 20th, 2007 18:08 |
| Where am I going wrong? | JamesQ | Flash & Multimedia Forum | 6 | Jun 5th, 2007 15:05 |
| What's gone wrong? | Alsilver | Web Page Design | 2 | Oct 22nd, 2006 14:11 |
| what am i doing wrong? | bsadaz | Web Page Design | 4 | Oct 16th, 2006 11:41 |