New Site Style

Here is something I was drafting out today for my new blog what do you think its nowhere near a finished product but its a sketch as such

Attached Images

	newstyle.jpg (10.8 KB, 72 views)
	newstyle2.jpg (10.5 KB, 68 views)

I'm not trying to be rude but it seems a little childish, IMO. The big fonts and tabs sorta give it that look, then the skyblue and clouds help it. But if that's the look your going for, or you just think I'm totally wrong, then keep going. The layout I can't exactly comment on because there isn't enough there to say anything about.

I don't think it's childish, it reminds me of a lighter version of darkmotion's site.

I was going for a happy high as a cloud kind of feel and a bit of web 2.0

I'm new so I have no idea who that is May I see it?

And I didn't put into consideration whether or not Sam is a man or woman also, since I've me both male and female with the same name.

EDIT
Samducker: You can also take a real picture of clouds and use a gradient fade on the bottom of the picture. It's come out nice before on other sites I've seen. Just an idea though.

Im a male but was going for a happy feel

oh and nice tip with real clouds didn't think of that I'll try it

In bright monitor, the cloud can't be see properly

I get it... and I like it! Very light, very web 2.0, very fun...
Works for me.

It is look very light and good. Let us see the rest part of site or for which site you are preparing this art ) Show the whole picture.
GOod luck

I also like it - it's not a bit childish! As Linda said, it's very web 2.0 and you have to go that way - everyone else has!

Ed.

As far as I know, web 2.0-style logo is:


I wonder whether samducker logo fit's in to this criteria?

What about http://skype.com/

No that's a typical, boring and more or less sh*t one! Who wants typical? A Web 2.0 logo is a modern, non 90'sish/2000ish logo.



Ed.

That's my point. So you know what is web 2.0 then! Does samducker's logo fits into that category as you mention earlier his logo is "very web 2.0"...
I don't think so! He must work "harder" to make the thing as a "web 2.0" logo. Currently it's just look like a simple graphic with less "web 2.0" effect, "non modern, non 90'sish/2000ish logo" as you say...
No offense there sanducker Consider them as a positive critique to your logo!

Cheers...