Would you please mind your language, there is simply no need for it.
Maybe I chose a bad example, I was thinking off the top of my head. But seeing as the entire BBC site is looked after by a team of 5 people, it's pretty impressive.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by minutedesigns
No Character Encoding Found! for a start,
|
well I can see it
- Code: Select all
<meta http-equiv="Content-type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
I think it may be the small t on Content-Type that is causing the validation issue
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by minutedesigns
then "there is no attribute "MARGINWIDTH"." why using that in HTML when they have CSS |
Again when I do a visual check of the code it doesn't seem to be there. I know what the validation check says (that it is assigned to the body tag) but when I look at the code, it just isn't there.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by minutedesigns
Agree or not, its my opinion.
|
Yes it is, and mine is that it is a clean coded site, in light of the size and complexity of the enitire site. I think we will just have to agree to disagree on this one.
But I am still interested to see if google thinks there is a difference, and if valid code actually means anything to the algorithum...